Do-Hyun Kim et al v South Korea (Constitutional Court, 2024)

¹ Do-Hyun Kim et al v South Korea [2024] 2020HunMa389 1

² Plan 1.5, ‘Korean Climate Litigation Decision Analysis Memo: Korean Constitutional Court Decision Case No. 2020Huma389’, 1 November 2024, accessed 10 February 2026

³ Lee, K. W. and Park, T. J., ‘South Korea’s landmark ruling on climate justice’, Nature Human Behaviour, 9 (2025), pp. 1067-1068,

⁴ Phillips, B., ‘South Korean Constitutional Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision in Climate Litigation’, International IDEA, 16 September 2024, , accessed 10 February 2026

⁵ Nissen, A., ‘Green Court – South Korean Constitutional Court Rules Landmark Climate Judgement’, EJIL Talk, 29 April 2025, , accessed 10 February 2026

⁶ Do-Hyun Kim et al v South Korea [2024] 2020HunMa389 1

⁷ Do-Hyun Kim et al v South Korea [2024] 2020HunMa389 23-32

⁸ Do-Hyun Kim et al. v. South Korea [2024] 2020HunMa389 1

⁹ Do-Hyun Kim et al v South Korea [2024] 2020HunMa389 29

¹⁰ Do-Hyun Kim et al v South Korea [2024] 2020HunMa389 30-31

¹¹ Park, J., ‘Top South Korea court says climate law doesn’t protect basic rights’, Reuters, 29 August 2024, , accessed 11 February 2026

¹² Seungseop, S., ‘Partial Constitutional Incompatibility of the Carbon Neutrality Act, Announcement of Stringent Climate Legislation for 2026’, The Asia Business Daily, 30 August 2024, , accessed 12 February 2026

¹³ Presidential Commission on Climate Crisis Response, ‘2024년 제9차 온실가스 감축 분과위원회 회의 결과’ [Results of the 9th Greenhouse Gas Reduction Subcommittee Meeting in 2024], 5 November 2024, , accessed 12 February 2026

¹⁴ Kaminski, I., ‘‘’Not just a single judicial event’: South Korea’s constitutional climate ruling 20 months on’, The Wave, 22 April 2026, , accessed 28 April 2026

¹⁵ Republic of Korea, ‘Submission under the Paris Agreement, The Republic of Korea’s 2035 Nationally Determined Contribution’, December 2025, , accessed 28 April 2026